You are here


Submitted by Roanman on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 06:42



From James Taranto at The Wall Street Journal who loves (hell, maybe lives) to torment The New York Times, on two very different responses to leaked information.

On "Climategate".

"The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won't be posted here."—New York Times, on the Climategate emails, Nov. 20, 2009.

On Wikileaks latest revelations.

"The articles published today and in coming days are based on thousands of United States embassy cables, the daily reports from the field intended for the eyes of senior policy makers in Washington. . . . The Times believes that the documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match."—New York Times, on the WikiLeaks documents, Nov. 29, 2010.

Politics? ................... Maybe?

Nahhhhh, not The Old Grey Lady.